Re: Bug #32319

[Konstantinos Poulios]

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Michael D Godfrey
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 04:48 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 2011, at 3:14 PM, Michael D Godfrey wrote:
>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject:     Re: Bug #32319
>> Date:        Sun, 13 Feb 2011 22:27:27 +0100
>> From:        logari81 <address@hidden>
>> To:  Michael D Godfrey <address@hidden>
>> CC:  octave maintainers mailing list <address@hidden>
>>
>> On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 13:11 -0800, Michael D Godfrey wrote:
>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Do you want to push the changeset for this bug (your bug32319-1b.diff
>> > plus the Changelog entry)?
>> >
>> > Does it make sense to close this report and open a new one about
>> > plots not being refreshed, which I mentioned in my last comment on
>> > 32319?  Or,  do you already know why that is happening?
>> >
>> > Michael
>> >
>
>>
>> hmm, I think we'd better wait for jwe's opinion about the patch. Maybe
>> he prefers to fix this bug making correct use of waitpid.
>>
>> In any case I don't have any explanation about the refresh problem yet,
>> but it would probably be easy to fix if I would have a way to reproduce
>> it.
>>
>> Kostas
>>
>> The patch referred to works correctly for me.  It fixes
>> the fdopen error problem in fltk backend.  I noticed
>> that it has been "waiting" long enough so that its lines
>> numbers not longer match the current source.
>>
>> Is it OK for Kostas to push an updated version?
>>
>> Michael
>
> I have no objection.
>
> Ben
>
>
> Kostas,
>
> I am sure it is OK to push this.  Unfortunately, the patch
> will need to be adjusted to the current files.  None of
> the line numbers match anymore, and you need to add
> a Changelog entry, of course.
>
> Please go ahead and push this patch.
>
> Michael
>

ok, I ll do it later today.

Kostas