Re: branching for release?

octave-maintainers

From:	Michael D Godfrey
Subject:	Re: branching for release?
Date:	Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:50:05 -0800
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7

On 01/19/2011 04:34 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:

Well, the future hypothetical Qt or GTK+ backends would also use OpenGL.

I kind of thought of that. Any suggestions??

Michael

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

branching for release?, John W. Eaton, 2011/01/18
- Re: branching for release?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/01/18
  - Re: branching for release?, Michael D Godfrey, 2011/01/18
    - Re: branching for release?, logari81, 2011/01/19
    - Re: branching for release?, Judd Storrs, 2011/01/19
    - Re: branching for release?, John W. Eaton, 2011/01/19
    - Re: branching for release?, Michael D Godfrey, 2011/01/19
    - Re: branching for release?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/01/19
    - Re: branching for release?, Michael D Godfrey <=
    - Re: branching for release?, Judd Storrs, 2011/01/19
    - renaming "backend" (was: Re: branching for release?), John W. Eaton, 2011/01/20
    - Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/20
    - Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/20
    - Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], logari81, 2011/01/21
    - Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/21
    - Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/21
    - Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], logari81, 2011/01/22
    - Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], logari81, 2011/01/22
    - Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/22