[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: bsxfun optimized
|
From: |
CdeMills |
|
Subject: |
Re: FYI: bsxfun optimized |
|
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:16:45 -0800 (PST) |
Jaroslav Hajek-2 wrote:
>
>
> This should have nothing to do with those optimizations; those should
> be bypassed for classes. I recommend you overload bsxfun for dataframe
> if you're interested in it at all, because that would probably allow
> you to do the operation way more efficiently. But in any case, this
> was designed to work, and it doesn't. And the error message even makes
> no sense, because 3x4 is bsxfun-compatible with 1x4. I suggest you
> file a bug report.
>
>
Sorry -- the error message originates from the overloaded minus function. I
introduced a bsxfun mapper in dataframes: could you please check the svn
version on octave-forge ?
Regards
Pascal
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/FYI-bsxfun-optimized-tp1656708p3214306.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.