[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new OOP syntax
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: new OOP syntax |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:35:16 -0600 |
On Nov 16, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Robert T. Short wrote:
>> Is there a way for a method associated with p to assign a new value to "p"
>> without a normal assigment (i.e. p = addRequired (...)))?
>>
> No. Or at least I don't think so.
>
> Bob
My hope was to determine the name of the object in the caller's scope, and then
use "evalin" to modify it.
It would be very *ugly*, but would let me implement something that functions as
inputParser does.
Ben
Re: new OOP syntax, John W. Eaton, 2010/11/16