On 28-Sep-2010, Rik wrote:
| Sometime ago we switched away from using Octave to generate the pdf images
| for the documentation to using ghostscript to render the eps into pdf
| format. This was due to problems in the printing backend at the time.
| Have those issues been resolved and can we switch back?
|
| I just sample checked a few of the images generated by plotimages.m in
| doc/interpreter and they seem to be created correctly. Currently the eps
| and png formats are created from Octave and the pdf by the Makefile via
| ghostscript, but it would be nice to have the documentation printing be
| unified with everything produced by Octave.
I don't object to making this change. Will we be using gnuplot or
gl2ps to generate the plots? Which looks better?
jwe