octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: wait_for_file ?? [print via pipes - help testing on Windows?]


From: bpabbott
Subject: Re: wait_for_file ?? [print via pipes - help testing on Windows?]
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:53:50 +0000 (GMT)

On 17 Sep, 2010,at 02:16 AM, Michael D Godfrey <address@hidden> wrote:

On 09/16/2010 06:58 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
I no longer have any errors with testing the printing on MacOS 10.6.4.

For complete functionality it is necessary to have pstoedit, fig2dev (from TransFig), and epstool installed.

I'm unable to do any testing for Windows. So it would be appreciated if a Windows user can test this changeset.

There's been some recent changesets that have effected my results, so I suggest pulling the current sources, and a build fresh.

My tip is ...

	http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/88687577519f

Ben

      
After installs of epstool and pstoedit I get:
octave:1> test_printing_20100916
warning: function name `test_printing' does not agree with function file name `/data/d/src/octave/hg/test_printing_20100916.m'
Xlib:  extension "NV-GLX" missing on display ":1175.0".
backend is fltk
print fltk-aifm  -daifm
error: fltk_backend: filename should be fid
warning: print.m: No such file or directory, '/tmp/oct-f9T0RH.eps'.
error: called from:
error:   /data/d/src/octave/hg/__fltk_print__.m at line 193, column 7
error:   /data/d/src/octave/hg/__fltk_print__.m at line 121, column 14
error:   /d/src/octave/hg/octave/scripts/plot/print.m at line 344, column 12
error:   /data/d/src/octave/hg/test_printing_20100916.m at line 65, column 9
========================================
This is current build and your changeset.patch of today.

Michael 
 

I should have been more clear. The changeset attached to the prior email has not been pushed. You'll need to patch your sources with that changeset.


Without the changeset __fltk_print__ has 197 lines. After it will only have 161. Since you have an error on line 193, I assume the changeset has not been applied.


Ben



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]