Re: see also

[fork]

> I agree that "see also" is important and every time I happen to be editing
> a function's documentation I try to update the links.  I guess I used to be
> more disappointed, but lately it feels like the situation is improving.  A
> call to __list_functions__ reveals that there were 1038 functions so I'm
> sure there is more work to do.

This is the sort of simple contribution that us wannabe (but not quite there
yet) hackers could do, especially if there were a list of functions whose docs
needed revising such that we could work on one and then check it off the list.

Is there facility on savannah for a big wiki page to keep track of something
like this?