[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Native TikZ backend?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Native TikZ backend? |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:53:00 -0400 |
On 11-Jul-2009, Søren Hauberg wrote:
| I'm not sure it's better if you're using gnuplot. But it seems to me
| that minor things get dropped when routing things through gnuplot from
| Octave. We have to express our plots within the limitations of gnuplot,
| which means that sometimes you don't get what you asked for. E.g.
| sometimes you don't get the markers on your plot that you asked for in
| Octave. We should be able to avoid such issues if we don't send things
| through gnuplot in the first place.
OK, predictible markers would be good. What about mixing line colors
and dashed lines?
| That being said, I'm not sure if it is worth spending time on such a
| backend.
It would just be for printing, right? You would still need the OpenGL
backend to generate plots for the screen?
But it could be worth the effort because I don't know that we
currently have a way to generate high quality output for printing when
using the OpenGL backend.
jwe
- Native TikZ backend?, Søren Hauberg, 2009/07/09
- Re: Native TikZ backend?, Ben Abbott, 2009/07/11
- Re: Native TikZ backend?, Søren Hauberg, 2009/07/11
- Re: Native TikZ backend?, John W. Eaton, 2009/07/11
- Re: Native TikZ backend?, Søren Hauberg, 2009/07/11
- Re: Native TikZ backend?,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Native TikZ backend?, Søren Hauberg, 2009/07/11
- Re: Native TikZ backend?, Søren Hauberg, 2009/07/11
- Re: Native TikZ backend?, Ben Abbott, 2009/07/28