Re: 3.2.0 release candidate 6

[Benjamin Lindner]

On 03.06.2009 08:31, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> hi all,
>
> Octave 3.2.0 RC6 tarballs available at:
>
> the changes since RC5 (listed below) are really minor (two test fixes,
> one example fix and a MSVC-specific issue).
> If you have already tested RC5, there's no need to redo using RC6, IMHO.
> It seems to me that almost all known bugs are now fixed (except those
> classified as platform specific or those we don't know how to fix).
> Unless anyone reports a problem with RC5 or RC6, RC6 will become the
> 3.2.0 release, probably on Friday, or during the weekend.

Building on mingw32 using tdm-gcc-4.3.0-2 fails with the error

! I can't find file 
`/home/hajek/devel/octave/release-3-2-x/examples/@polynomial/polynomial.m'.

while building documentation.
removing the file conf.texi from the source tree solves the problem and 
the build runs cleanly.

make check:

Summary:

  PASS   5709
  FAIL      9

with the 9 fails in src/data.cc

src\data.cc  PASS  500/509  FAIL 9


The log output is

>>>>> processing 
d:\files\admin\octaveforge_svn\trunk\octave-forge\admin\Windows\mingw32\octave\octave-3.2.0\src\data.cc
  ***** assert(log2(complex(0,Inf)), Inf + log2(i));
!!!!! test failed
assert (log2 (complex (0, Inf)),Inf + log2 (i)) expected
Inf + 2.266i
but got
NaN + 2.266i
NaNs don't match  ***** test
 [f, e] = log2 ([0,-1; 2,-4; Inf,-Inf]);
 assert (f, [0,-0.5; 0.5,-0.5; Inf,-Inf]);
 assert (e, [0,1;2,3;0,0])
!!!!! test failed
assert (f,[0, -0.5; 0.5, -0.5; Inf, -Inf]) expected
   0.00000  -0.50000
   0.50000  -0.50000
       Inf      -Inf
but got
   0.00000  -0.50000
   0.50000  -0.50000
       NaN       NaN
NaNs don't match  ***** test
 [f, e] = log2 (complex (zeros (3, 2), [0,-1; 2,-4; Inf,-Inf]));
 assert (f, complex (zeros (3, 2), [0,-0.5; 0.5,-0.5; Inf,-Inf]));
 assert (e, [0,1; 2,3; 0,0]);
!!!!! test failed
assert (f,complex (zeros (3, 2), [0, -0.5; 0.5, -0.5; Inf, -Inf])) expected
   0.00000 + 0.00000i   0.00000 - 0.50000i
   0.00000 + 0.50000i   0.00000 - 0.50000i
   0.00000 +     Infi   0.00000 -     Infi
but got
   0.00000 + 0.00000i   0.00000 - 0.50000i
   0.00000 + 0.50000i   0.00000 - 0.50000i
       NaN -     NaNi       NaN -     NaNi
NaNs don't match  ***** assert (sort ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf], "descend"), 
[NaN, Inf, 2, -1, 1i])
!!!!! test failed
assert (sort ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf], "descend"),[NaN, Inf, 2, -1, 1i]) 
expected
   NaN +   0i   Inf +   0i     2 +   0i    -1 +   0i     0 +   1i
but got
   NaN +   0i     2 +   0i    -1 +   0i     0 +   1i   Inf +   0i
Infs don't matchshared variables {
  m2 =

     1   2
     3   4

  flo = 0
  fhi = Inf
}
  ***** assert (sort ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf], 2, "descend"), [NaN, Inf, 
2, -1, 1i])
!!!!! test failed
assert (sort ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf], 2, "descend"),[NaN, Inf, 2, -1, 
1i]) expected
   NaN +   0i   Inf +   0i     2 +   0i    -1 +   0i     0 +   1i
but got
   NaN +   0i     2 +   0i    -1 +   0i     0 +   1i   Inf +   0i
Infs don't matchshared variables {
  m2 =

     1   2
     3   4

  flo = 0
  fhi = Inf
}
  ***** test
 [v, i] = sort ([NaN, 1i, -1, Inf, 1, 1i]);
 assert (v, [1, 1i, 1i, -1, Inf, NaN])
 assert (i, [5, 2, 6, 3, 4, 1])
!!!!! test failed
assert (v,[1, 1i, 1i, -1, Inf, NaN]) expected
 Columns 1 through 5:

     1 +   0i     0 +   1i     0 +   1i    -1 +   0i   Inf +   0i

 Column 6:

   NaN +   0i
but got
 Columns 1 through 5:

     0 +   1i    -1 +   0i   Inf +   0i     1 +   0i     0 +   1i

 Column 6:

   NaN +   0i
Infs don't matchshared variables {
  m2 =

     1   2
     3   4

  flo = 0
  fhi = Inf
}
  ***** assert (sort (single([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf]), "descend"), 
single([NaN, Inf, 2, -1, 1i]))
!!!!! test failed
assert (sort (single ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf]), "descend"),single ([NaN, 
Inf, 2, -1, 1i])) expected
   NaN +   0i   Inf +   0i     2 +   0i    -1 +   0i     0 +   1i
but got
   NaN +   0i     2 +   0i    -1 +   0i     0 +   1i   Inf +   0i
Infs don't matchshared variables {
  m2 =

     1   2
     3   4

  flo = 0
  fhi = Inf
}
  ***** assert (sort (single([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf]), 2, "descend"), 
single([NaN, Inf, 2, -1, 1i]))
!!!!! test failed
assert (sort (single ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf]), 2, "descend"),single 
([NaN, Inf, 2, -1, 1i])) expected
   NaN +   0i   Inf +   0i     2 +   0i    -1 +   0i     0 +   1i
but got
   NaN +   0i     2 +   0i    -1 +   0i     0 +   1i   Inf +   0i
Infs don't matchshared variables {
  m2 =

     1   2
     3   4

  flo = 0
  fhi = Inf
}
  ***** test
 [v, i] = sort (single([NaN, 1i, -1, Inf, 1, 1i]));
 assert (v, single([1, 1i, 1i, -1, Inf, NaN]))
 assert (i, [5, 2, 6, 3, 4, 1])
!!!!! test failed
assert (v,single ([1, 1i, 1i, -1, Inf, NaN])) expected
 Columns 1 through 5:

     1 +   0i     0 +   1i     0 +   1i    -1 +   0i   Inf +   0i

 Column 6:

   NaN +   0i
but got
 Columns 1 through 5:

     0 +   1i    -1 +   0i   Inf +   0i     1 +   0i     0 +   1i

 Column 6:

   NaN +   0i
Infs don't matchshared variables {
  m2 =

     1   2
     3   4

  flo = 0
  fhi = Inf
}



The 6 sorting fails I guess are similar to the ones seen on cygwin (but 
there are 7 fails reported?)
The first 3 look like a math-lib bug in mingw32. I guess we have to live 
with them.

benjamin