[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:58:27 -0400 |
On 8-Apr-2009, Judd Storrs wrote:
| http://www.fltk.org/COPYING.php
|
| The FLTK license appears to be GPLv2 only plus some other freedoms
| that unfortunately don't seem to look GPL compatible.
It looks to me like the modifications are additional permissions, not
restrictions. I don't see how additional permissions could be
incompatible with the GPL/LGPL.
jwe
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, (continued)
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, John W. Eaton, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, John W. Eaton, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, John W. Eaton, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing,
John W. Eaton <=
Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/08