[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: deprecated functions
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: deprecated functions |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:59:51 -0500 |
On 4-Mar-2009, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
| I agree it would be more useful, as they really are special kind of
| sparse matrices.
| But it would break backward and Matlab compatibility in a fairly
| invasive way (infinitely more than the recently discussed NaN issues),
| so I think a wide agreement is really necessary here.
OK, if we don't make diag x sparse matrices retain the sparsity, then
what method do we have that allows row or column scaling of a sparse
matrix (for example) which preserves sparsity? The modified version
of dmult did that, correct? I think that's what Jason was complaining
about (correct me if I'm wrong).
jwe
- Re: Diagonal v. sparse matrices [was Re: deprecated functions], (continued)
- Re: Diagonal v. sparse matrices [was Re: deprecated functions], Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/04
- Re: Diagonal v. sparse matrices, Jason Riedy, 2009/03/04
- Re: Diagonal v. sparse matrices, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/04
- Re: Diagonal v. sparse matrices, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions, John W. Eaton, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: deprecated functions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions, John W. Eaton, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions, Jason Riedy, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions, Jason Riedy, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/05
- Re: deprecated functions, John W. Eaton, 2009/03/05
- Re: deprecated functions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/05
- Re: deprecated functions, Jason Riedy, 2009/03/05
- Re: deprecated functions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/05