octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Further on MEX


From: Aravindh Krishnamoorthy
Subject: Re: Further on MEX
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:22:49 +0530

Dear John,

On 07/01/2009, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> On  7-Jan-2009, Aravindh Krishnamoorthy wrote:
>
> | I was under the impression that you'd like to encourage proprietary
> | addons
>
> Where did you ever get that idea?
>

>> My objection is that it is at least against the spirit of the GPL and
>> I would not like to move further in this direction.  I have no
>> interest in encouraging proprietary add-ons for Octave.

My understanding from your earlier mails was different. But now I
understand exactly your thoughts about future of proprietary add-ons
for Octave.
I'm not going to work on the pipe-based binary bridge.

Yours sincerely,
Aravindh


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]