[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: diagonal matrices specializations
From: |
Bill Denney |
Subject: |
Re: diagonal matrices specializations |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:30:35 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) |
Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> Yes, that is of course possible, just I wasn't sure whether it's the
> right thing. If the
> Octave's hdf5 format is only supposed to be read by Octave, then that's OK.
So, I've not followed all of this in detail, but it seems to me that
loading a variable from disk would take significantly longer than the
determination if it is a diagonal matrix. How difficult would it be to
save files using the full format (or as a sparse matrix which probably
makes more sense) and upon loading determine if it is diagonal and make
it have the right class then. That should work for all external formats
I may be way off, but that seems like the best way to deal with diagonal
matrices when loading and with external formats.
Have a good day,
Bill
- Re: diagonal matrices specializations, (continued)
- Re: diagonal matrices specializations, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/12/08
- Re: diagonal matrices specializations, John W. Eaton, 2008/12/09
- Re: diagonal matrices specializations, dbateman, 2008/12/09
- Re: diagonal matrices specializations, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/12/10
- Re: diagonal matrices specializations, John W. Eaton, 2008/12/10
- Message not available
- Re: diagonal matrices specializations, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/12/11
- Re: diagonal matrices specializations, John W. Eaton, 2008/12/11
- Re: diagonal matrices specializations, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/12/11
- Re: diagonal matrices specializations, dbateman, 2008/12/11
- Re: diagonal matrices specializations, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/12/12
- Re: diagonal matrices specializations,
Bill Denney <=
- Message not available
- Re: diagonal matrices specializations, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/12/11