[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Plotting status in Octave
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: Plotting status in Octave |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:19:02 -0500 |
2008/10/22 John W. Eaton <address@hidden>:
> On 22-Oct-2008, Jonathan Stickel wrote:
>
> | I just don't have the c++ skills to make much progress myself.
>
> I didn't know much about C++ when I started working on Octave (some
> might say I still don't now much).
Ahem. :P
But in all seriousness, C++ is a Frankenstein monster. I don't think
anyone knows it well except the language lawyers in comp.lang.c++, and
even they can't agree on what the next standard should look like.
This doesn't mean it's not a useful language. It's my first language,
and in all the time I've been using it, I still feel like there are
things I don't know about it very well (e.g. template metaprogramming
for avoiding temporaries in arithmetic expressions, wtf).
Anyways, sorry for expressing my offtopicky opinions about C++. It's a
language I feel very strongly about, both good and bad.
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: compiling from hg sources (was Re: Plotting status in Octave), (continued)
- Re: compiling from hg sources (was Re: Plotting status in Octave), Jonathan Stickel, 2008/10/30
- Re: compiling from hg sources (was Re: Plotting status in Octave), Michael Goffioul, 2008/10/30
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, Michael Goffioul, 2008/10/23
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, John W. Eaton, 2008/10/23
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/10/23
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, Michael Goffioul, 2008/10/23
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, John W. Eaton, 2008/10/23
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, Shai Ayal, 2008/10/23
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, John Swensen, 2008/10/23
Re: Plotting status in Octave, John W. Eaton, 2008/10/22
- Re: Plotting status in Octave,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=