[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: classdef support for octave
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: classdef support for octave |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Sep 2008 12:43:13 +0200 |
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:31 AM, David Bateman
<address@hidden> wrote:
> No comments not because of lack of interest but because my minds on other
> things.. I think it would be great to have classdef support for 3.2 if its
> relatively easy to implement as you imply.
I didn't imply that :-)
A complete implementation requires work on the internal data representation
and MOP, work on the parser for the syntactic sugar (classdef parsing,
?-syntax for class access, @-syntax for overloaded method call in the
parent classes...), work on the tree evaluator (for package scope handling).
So 3.2 is not a realistic target. For now, I'm mainly thinking about the
first part.
Michael.