[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Class Objects Usage
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: Class Objects Usage |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Jul 2008 21:21:59 +0200 |
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Michael Goffioul
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I can reproduce the problem. I'll have a look.
I debugged a little bit with my code, which corresponds to the graphics
archive (not the latest octave archive, but quite close). The problem is
that in Fclass, fcn->is_class_constructor() returns false (I use the same
polynom example). At that point, fcn is actually the "class" function of
type octave_builtin, while I think the expected value is the "polynom"
function. I stepped into the previous octave_call_stack::caller() call and
it appears that the callstack contains 2 elements:
[0]: polynom
[1]: class
and octave_call_stack::caller() actually returns the second one.
Might this be related to the uncommited change in octave_call_stack
that you mentioned in another mail?
Michael.