[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Changeset]: octave_value(const ArrayN<octave_idx_type>&) constructo
|
From: |
John W. Eaton |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Changeset]: octave_value(const ArrayN<octave_idx_type>&) constructor |
|
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:14:07 -0400 |
On 26-Jun-2008, David Bateman wrote:
| consider the attached changeset instead.
It seems odd to me that the octave_value constructor that takes an
Array<octave_idx_type> value would convert it to NDArray internally
instead of storing it as an Array<octave_idx_type>. The other
conversions also seem odd, but I guess we already have a few other
constructors that have similar options. What about defining
Array<octave_idx_type> to NDArray conversion with the options and then
using the existing octave_value (const NDArray&) constructor instead?
It seems to me that this approach might cause less trouble later if we
decided we wanted an actual Array<octave_idx_type> value in the
octave_value hierarchy.
jwe