[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging graphics branch
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Merging graphics branch |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:37:54 -0400 |
On 18-Jun-2008, Michael Goffioul wrote:
| Actually, Matlab supports both. Value classes are what is currently
| present in octave. Handle classes are somehow a generalization of
| what the current graphics system implements, where objects act
| more like pointers.
OK, so should we be thinking about ways to implement the handle graphics
system as these new kinds of objects? If so, then I think that is a
relatively big project. I know that I don't have time at the moment
to think about how this should be done.
jwe
- Re: Merging graphics branch, John W. Eaton, 2008/06/05
- Re: Merging graphics branch, John Swensen, 2008/06/05
- Re: Merging graphics branch, Michael Goffioul, 2008/06/16
- Re: Merging graphics branch, Michael Goffioul, 2008/06/16
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Merging graphics branch, Bill Denney, 2008/06/16
- Re: Merging graphics branch, Michael Goffioul, 2008/06/16
- Re: Merging graphics branch, Michael Goffioul, 2008/06/17
- Re: Merging graphics branch, John W. Eaton, 2008/06/18
- Re: Merging graphics branch, Michael Goffioul, 2008/06/18
- Re: Merging graphics branch,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Merging graphics branch, Michael Goffioul, 2008/06/19
Re: Merging graphics branch, Michael Goffioul, 2008/06/05