[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in expm
From: |
Jaroslav Hajek |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in expm |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:26:22 +0200 |
OK, I see what was the intention. I'll make the changeset tomorrow.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Marco Caliari <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > I've tried to convert these two diff patches to a hg changeset for
> > John's convenience, but
> > the dMatrix.cc patch failed. Did you make the patches against the most
> > recent sources?
> > If not, can you please refresh?
> >
>
> I made them against octave-3.0.1. Now I'm away for ten days...
> The dMatrix.cc.patch should exchange the lines
>
> // leading permutations in forward order
> for (octave_idx_type i = nc - 1; i>= ihi; i--)
>
> with
>
> // trailing permutations must be done in reverse order
> for (octave_idx_type i = 0; i < (ilo-1); i++)
>
> Marco
>
--
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
- Bug in expm, Marco Caliari, 2008/04/22
- Bug in expm, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/22
- Re: Bug in expm, Marco Caliari, 2008/04/23
- Re: Bug in expm, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/04/24
- Re: Bug in expm, Marco Caliari, 2008/04/24
- Re: Bug in expm,
Jaroslav Hajek <=
- Re: Bug in expm, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/04/26
- Re: Bug in expm, Marco Caliari, 2008/04/26
- Re: Bug in expm, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/04/26
- Re: Bug in expm, Marco Caliari, 2008/04/27
- Re: Bug in expm, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/29