[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposed parser changes
From: |
Søren Hauberg |
Subject: |
Re: proposed parser changes |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:03:31 +0100 |
tor, 13 03 2008 kl. 14:33 -0400, skrev John W. Eaton:
> Now I'm beginning to think the advantage of improved compatibility and
> not having to tag functions as commands outweighs the trouble that
> might be caused by this small inconsistency.
>
> Also, we no longer mark any functions in Octave or Octave Forge with
> the "rawcommand" tag. It was only used to support the special syntax
> used by gset/gplot/gsplot. Now that those are gone I see no reason to
> keep the "rawcommand" tag in any case.
>
> Comments?
I'd say make the change. IMHO commands suck, and everybody (including
myself) really should be using functions. But since people don't it's
nice to be compatible with the other brand.
Søren