octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: proposed parser changes


From: Søren Hauberg
Subject: Re: proposed parser changes
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:03:31 +0100

tor, 13 03 2008 kl. 14:33 -0400, skrev John W. Eaton:
> Now I'm beginning to think the advantage of improved compatibility and
> not having to tag functions as commands outweighs the trouble that
> might be caused by this small inconsistency.
> 
> Also, we no longer mark any functions in Octave or Octave Forge with
> the "rawcommand" tag.  It was only used to support the special syntax
> used by gset/gplot/gsplot.  Now that those are gone I see no reason to
> keep the "rawcommand" tag in any case.
> 
> Comments?
I'd say make the change. IMHO commands suck, and everybody (including
myself) really should be using functions. But since people don't it's
nice to be compatible with the other brand.

Søren



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]