[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Polyfit with scaling
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: Polyfit with scaling |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:11:01 -0800 |
On Monday, February 04, 2008, at 04:21PM, "Dmitri A. Sergatskov"
<address@hidden> wrote:
>Looks good, though i have a couple minor comments:
>
>-- if std(x) == 0 then it means that all x are the same number (I
>would also argue that one
> may want to compare to eps rather than 0). In that case we cannot
>do any fits,
> so probaly should just exit with an error.
>
>-- I really do not like have variables that different only in
>capitalization: x and X in this code.
> I would rename X to XX or something. But this is matter of taste
>and I would leave it to
> jwe to have the final say.
>
I agree. I hadn't got around to changing that.
Ben
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, (continued)
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Thomas Weber, 2008/02/04
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/04
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/04
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, John W. Eaton, 2008/02/04
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/02/04
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, John W. Eaton, 2008/02/04
- Re: Polyfit with scaling,
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/04
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/02/04
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/04
- Message not available
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/04
- Re: Polyfit with scaling - Q regarding polyval, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/05
- Re: Polyfit with scaling - Q regarding polyconf, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/13
- Re: Polyfit with scaling - Q regarding polyconf, Thomas Weber, 2008/02/13
- Re: Polyfit with scaling - Q regarding polyconf, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/13
- Re: Polyfit with scaling - Q regarding polyconf, Thomas Weber, 2008/02/13
- Re: Polyfit with scaling - Q regarding polyconf, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/13