[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: change to residue.m
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: change to residue.m |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:52:35 +0800 |
On Dec 29, 2007, at 9:59 PM, Doug Stewart wrote:
Ben Abbott wrote:
Doug Stewart and I invested some time and effort improving the
accuracy of the residue.m script when pole multiplicity exists.
Doug's suggestion, which we've each invested several hours testing,
was to set the value of each unique pole to that average of the
multiple poles associated with it. The result has been found to be
a few orders of magnitude more accurate.
To capture the improvement, the test scripts were also modified to
be more stringent.
In the event, for those interested in verifying our work, I've
attached the patch and ChangeLog.
Ben
I don't see any response to this Email from Dec 24th on the
maintainers list. Did it get implemented?
Doug Stewart
I haven't checked the cvs, but I don't think so. I plan to submit it
to John for consideration tomorrow.
Ben