[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0 when?
|
From: |
Dupuis |
|
Subject: |
Re: 3.0 when? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:41:22 -0800 (PST) |
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
>
> Oh, I love when people make assumptions about the readiness and
> availability
> of free software volunteers :-). Consider joining the DOG [1] and help us
> making your assumptions become true.
>
> [...]
>
>
No pun intented, I just noticed that around periods less intense in terms of
workload, there were more updates in the FOSS field :-)
Best regards
Pascal
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/3.0-when--tp14302364p14370295.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/12
- Re: 3.0 when?, David Bateman, 2007/12/12
- Re: 3.0 when?, Dupuis, 2007/12/13
- Re: 3.0 when?, Peter A. Gustafson, 2007/12/13
- Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/13
- print function options; imread/imwrite (was: Re: 3.0 when?), John W. Eaton, 2007/12/13
- Re: imread/imwrite, Søren Hauberg, 2007/12/14
- Re: imread/imwrite, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/14
- Re: imread/imwrite, Søren Hauberg, 2007/12/14
- Re: 3.0 when?, Rafael Laboissiere, 2007/12/14
- Re: 3.0 when?,
Dupuis <=
Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/13
Re: 3.0 when?, Kai Habel, 2007/12/13
Re: 3.0 when?, Benjamin Lindner, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/19