Re: Fwd: 'for' loop vectorization

[Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso]

On 24/10/2007, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
> I went to a lot of effort a while back to get a memory efficient and
> fast triu/tril in an oct-file. However, at the time I proposed it John
> thought that it was too hard to maintain relative to the m-file version
> and the amount of use that triu/tril see doesn't justify this additional
> maintenance .

So what does the competition do here? triu seems like a reasonable
function to be used in vectorisation, and I really want my "clever"
vectorisation of the cummax function to work. If triu isn't the way to
vectorise, then I'll have to come up with another solution to the
cummax vectorisation puzzle.

- Jordi G. H.