[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Redirectable octave?
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: Redirectable octave? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Oct 2007 06:52:12 +0200 |
On 10/17/07, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> | Indeed, I would rather avoid dealing with C++ types as it makes dynamic
> | loading difficult (impossible?).
>
> I think it is just more difficult because you have to deal with name
> mangling, but it should not be impossible.
And it would be compiler dependent, right? I would prefer something
more generic.
> In any case, I don't have plans to do something like this myself, but
> I would perhaps consider patches after 3.0.
OK, I can have a look at it. I just wanted to know whether it was worth
working on it.
Michael.
- Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/15
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/16
- Re: Redirectable octave?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/16
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/17
- Re: Redirectable octave?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/17
- Re: Redirectable octave?,
Michael Goffioul <=
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/18
- Re: Redirectable octave?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/18
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/18
- Re: Redirectable octave?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/18
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/18
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/18