[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OctavePackaging
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: OctavePackaging |
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2007 22:20:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
Quentin Spencer wrote:
> John W. Eaton wrote:
>> On 11-May-2007, David Bateman wrote:
>>
>> | What about something like the attached patch to pkg.m. If adds the
>> | features discussed in the previous e-mail.. I hope this is
>> sufficient to
>> | address your needs..
>>
>> If you think we can come to an agreement about what changes are needed
>> for pkg.m within a few days, then I'll hold 2.9.11 until it is ready.
>> If it will take much longer than that, then I'll go ahead with 2.9.11
>> now.
>>
>
> I think this was mentioned before, but I thought I'd bring it up again
> (without having spent any significant time actually testing it). Someone
> suggested a verbose option for pkg so that compilation is not done
> silently. I would want the Fedora octave packaging scripts to use such
> an option in case something fails when submitted to a remote build queue
> to make debugging easier.
>
> Quentin
>
Want to propose a patch :-)
Cheers
David
- Re: OctavePackaging, David Bateman, 2007/05/11
- Re: OctavePackaging, David Bateman, 2007/05/11
- Re: OctavePackaging, John W. Eaton, 2007/05/11
- Re: OctavePackaging, John W. Eaton, 2007/05/11
- Re: OctavePackaging, David Bateman, 2007/05/11
- Re: OctavePackaging, Quentin Spencer, 2007/05/11
- Re: OctavePackaging,
David Bateman <=
- Re: OctavePackaging, David Bateman, 2007/05/11
- Re: OctavePackaging, John W. Eaton, 2007/05/11
- Re: OctavePackaging, David Bateman, 2007/05/12
- Re: OctavePackaging, Thomas Weber, 2007/05/14