[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: concatenation bug?
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: concatenation bug? |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:05:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
John W. Eaton wrote:
> Is there some reason that the following must fail?
>
> x = {1, 2};
> [x, @sin]
> error: concatenation operator not implemented for `cell' by `function
> handle' operations
>
> It seems that Matlab barfs on this as well, but I don't see why.
>
I see no reason for this to fail.. The operand should be promoted to a
cell array before concatenation in this case, equivalent to "[x,
address@hidden", which works both in octave and matlab if @sin is explicitly
encapsulated in a cell array first. I'd suggest that all types should
have a widening operation to allow this.
> The reason I want to use it is to do something like this:
>
> args = {x, y};
> args = [args, @somefun];
> anotherfun (args{:});
>
> Note that the following does work in Matlab:
>
> args = address@hidden;
> args = [args, pi/2];
> feval (args{:});
>
> jwe
>
>
Regards
David
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary