[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: on the glpk patch for octave
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: on the glpk patch for octave |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Mar 2007 02:16:23 -0500 |
On 2-Mar-2007, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| I did not test test the patch with 4.14, but I trust it should work with
| 4.14. I chose the preprocessor macro name as GLPK_PRE_4_15 for
| pragmatic reasons. If it is well tested that the patch work with 4.14, I
| have nothing against changing the macro name to GLPK_PRE_4_14.
The patch does a feature test in the configure script, so the macro
name does not indicate that you are testing for a particular version
number, correct? Instead of a version, the macro could be named
HAVE_GLPK_SOME_FEATURE, but what should "SOME_FEATURE" be? Unless
someone can think of something significantly better, then we might as
well leave it as it is.
Thanks,
jwe