[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New function proposal
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: New function proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:18:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
Michael,
pipe needs changing as well. I think John needs to express what he wants
done and will accept in the code to here..
Cheers
David
address@hidden wrote:
> Thi version does not change error behavior and output variables
> of popen2.
>
> Michael.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Yes, well looking at popen2 and pipe that it call I think they are in
> > serious need of a rewrite in any case. They both still use deprecated
> > list objects rather than cell arrays. That being the case probably
> > option 2 is probably the best.
>
> Here's another variant, which moves popen2 into C++ and provides
> Win32 implementation. Note that the UNIX version is not tested *at all*
> (I don't even know if it compiles): I just tried to convert popen2.m in
> C++, but it probably needs fixing.
>
> Michael.
>
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
- New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/12
- RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/13
- Re: New function proposal, David Bateman, 2007/02/13
- Re: New function proposal, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/13
- Re: New function proposal, Paul Kienzle, 2007/02/13
- Re: New function proposal, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/14
- Re: New function proposal, Michael Goffioul, 2007/02/15
- Re: New function proposal, David Bateman, 2007/02/15