[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Autoloading of toolboxes? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:43:34 -0500 |
On 30-Jan-2007, Michael Creel wrote:
| From the perspective of making things simpler, I would suggest
| releasing ver. 3.0 as soon as possible, along with o-f. As long as
| the computations are correct, it's good enough to be released. Added
| features can go into the stable release, following the linux kernel
| model, or can be put into a future development version. It would be
| a nice change to have the stable release as the recommended version
| :-)
Applications for the position of "release manager for Octave" are
still being accepted. I can't offer salary or benefits, but you can
choose your formal job title from "Chief Release Officer" or "Vice
President of Release Technology" or whatever else you prefer.
jwe
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, (continued)
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, Søren Hauberg, 2007/01/29
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, David Bateman, 2007/01/29
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, Bill Denney, 2007/01/29
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, David Bateman, 2007/01/30
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, David Bateman, 2007/01/30
Autoloading of toolboxes?, John W. Eaton, 2007/01/29