[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: moving toward a 3.0 release
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: moving toward a 3.0 release |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:06:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
Bill Denney wrote:
> David Bateman wrote:
>> So would you be willing to try to write a backend? Do you know of
>> someone who would? How long do you estimate the time needed (taking into
>> account that this is a volunteer project) to write such a backend? Sorry
>> to be direct, but these need to be answered so that John can fix the
>> feature freeze date.
> At this point, I can't really volunteer to write a backend. I really
> just don't have the time to work on it.
>
> I think that octaviz and octplot would probably work for the backend.
> Honestly, I think that finishing the frontend would take about another
> 20-30 hours for me, and I think that a backend would take another 10
> hours for someone else. I could write an SVG backend, but I don't
> have experience writing graphics applications, so I wouldn't want to
> volunteer for anything other than that.
>
> That said, for me to try to find 20-30 hours for the frontend and
> another 10 for the backend would be very difficult right now. For
> another person to volunteer to do it, if they had a relatively large
> amount of free time, it could be done in two-three weeks.
>
> Bill
>
Ok, so we are looking for a volunteer with a few weeks to spend adapting
your frontend and writing a backend.. Basically for historical reasons,
I think a gnuplot backend is the first that should be written.. Any
volunteers?
D.
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
- Interpreter performance (was: Re: moving toward a 3.0 release), (continued)
- Interpreter performance (was: Re: moving toward a 3.0 release), John W. Eaton, 2006/09/29
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, David Bateman, 2006/09/27
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/27
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, David Bateman, 2006/09/27
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/27
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, Bill Denney, 2006/09/27
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2006/09/27
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, Bill Denney, 2006/09/28
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, David Bateman, 2006/09/28
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, Bill Denney, 2006/09/28
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release,
David Bateman <=
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, Quentin Spencer, 2006/09/28
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, David Bateman, 2006/09/28
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/28
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, Bill Denney, 2006/09/29
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, David Bateman, 2006/09/29
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, Sebastien Loisel, 2006/09/28
- graphics issues (was: Re: moving toward a 3.0 release), John W. Eaton, 2006/09/29
- Re: graphics issues (was: Re: moving toward a 3.0 release), Sebastien Loisel, 2006/09/29
- Re: graphics issues (was: Re: moving toward a 3.0 release), Shai Ayal, 2006/09/29
- Re: graphics issues (was: Re: moving toward a 3.0 release), John W. Eaton, 2006/09/29