|
From: | Dmitri A. Sergatskov |
Subject: | Re: moving toward a 3.0 release |
Date: | Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:15:48 -0600 |
On 9/27/06, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
Since it seems that calls to these functions are relatively complex, it would be nice to have another layer around the Fortran at the liboctave level so that if someone wanted to use this functionality in C++ they could do it more easily. That is secondary to finding out the cause of the crash, but it might help to be able to call this code directly from a C++ program without all of Octave in the way.
I have a stupid question, why don't we use arpack++ then?
jwe
Dmitri. -- -- .
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |