[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C++ version of regexprep.cc
From: |
Paul Kienzle |
Subject: |
Re: C++ version of regexprep.cc |
Date: |
Tue, 2 May 2006 11:02:23 -0400 |
On May 2, 2006, at 10:39 AM, David Bateman wrote:
Paul Kienzle wrote:
On May 2, 2006, at 7:25 AM, David Bateman wrote:
John, do you want mat2cell committed as well?
mat2cell is a core function and it works like expected so the answer
should be yes.
Yes, but I commit nothing without Johns say so.
Agreed. My comment was for John.
%!test
%! x = 'abcdefghij';
%! c = mat2cell(x,1,[0,4,2,0,4,0]);
%! assert(c,{'','abcd','ef','','ghij',''})
Yes but in matlab size('c{1} is [1,0]!!! So it is the test that is in
fact wrong. The resize function I recently added might be used here to
change the test to
%!
assert(c,{resize('',1,0),'abcd',ef',resize('',1,0),'ghij',resize('',1,0
)})
Hmmm... is this bug for bug compatibility? What do the following do:
cell2mat({'','abcd','ef','','gh'})
cell2mat(mat2cell('abcdefgh',1,[0,4,2,0,2]))
Perhaps we should change isequal to test isempty on expected and
result, and if both true then return true?
If you need finer control on the kind of empty you can use the
following in your tests:
%! assert(size(expected),size(result))
%! assert(class(expected),class(result))
- Paul
- Re: C++ version of regexprep.cc, David Bateman, 2006/05/01
- Re: C++ version of regexprep.cc, Bill Denney, 2006/05/01
- Re: C++ version of regexprep.cc, Paul Kienzle, 2006/05/01
- Re: C++ version of regexprep.cc, David Bateman, 2006/05/02
- Re: C++ version of regexprep.cc, Paul Kienzle, 2006/05/02
- Re: C++ version of regexprep.cc, David Bateman, 2006/05/02
- Re: C++ version of regexprep.cc, David Bateman, 2006/05/02
- Re: C++ version of regexprep.cc, John W. Eaton, 2006/05/02
- Re: C++ version of regexprep.cc, Tom Holroyd, 2006/05/02
- Re: C++ version of regexprep.cc, David Bateman, 2006/05/03
- Re: C++ version of regexprep.cc, John W. Eaton, 2006/05/03
- Re: C++ version of regexprep.cc, Paul Kienzle, 2006/05/02