[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.9.5 and 2.1.73
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: 2.9.5 and 2.1.73 |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:51:24 -0500 |
On 16-Mar-2006, David Bateman wrote:
| > BTW, do you think it is time that we removed the *SSTREAM macros and
| > just assume that the C++ compiler has sstream? I would expect that
| > any compiler that can build Octave will have that by now.
|
| Your call. Though I'd suggest to leave it till after 2.9.5.
Sure, it doesn't need to be done immediately. I just meant can you
see any reason that we would need to keep the code around? Are there
any systems that we care about that have only the old non-standard
strstream classes? My guess is no.
jwe
Re: 2.9.5 and 2.1.73, David Bateman, 2006/03/14
Re: 2.9.5 and 2.1.73, David Bateman, 2006/03/14
Re: 2.9.5 and 2.1.73, David Bateman, 2006/03/14
Re: 2.9.5 and 2.1.73, John W. Eaton, 2006/03/16