[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cygwin build sensitivity to gcc version
From: |
Paul Kienzle |
Subject: |
Re: Cygwin build sensitivity to gcc version |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:28:09 -0500 |
I didn't try it on windows, but profiling worked fine on linux.
This was about four years ago, so I don't remember the details,
but it didn't take a whole lot to get it working.
- Paul
On Mar 14, 2004, at 5:01 PM, Paul Thomas wrote:
I posted the problem with the octave slow-up between gcc-3.2 and
gcc-3.2.
The gcc maintainers came back, of course, with the request that octave
be
profiled, that the two versions be compared and the a sample code
fragment
be written that reproduces the slow-up. I think that this might be
useful
to do anyway, since the sensitivity is occurring exactly where octave
underperforms somewhat.
I am prepared to give profiling a go but will almost certainly need
some
help and guidance. Has anybody any experience of using the -pg option
with
gprof?
Paul T
- Re: imread image sizing, (continued)
- Re: imread image sizing, Daniel J Sebald, 2004/03/10
- Re: imread image sizing, John W. Eaton, 2004/03/10
- Re: imread image sizing, Daniel J Sebald, 2004/03/10
- Re: imread image sizing, John W. Eaton, 2004/03/10
- Re: imread image sizing, Daniel J Sebald, 2004/03/10
- Re: imread image sizing, Paul Kienzle, 2004/03/10
- Re: imread image sizing, Daniel J Sebald, 2004/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: imread image sizing, Stefan van der Walt, 2004/03/12
- Re: imread image sizing, John W. Eaton, 2004/03/12
Cygwin build sensitivity to gcc version, Paul Thomas, 2004/03/14
- Re: Cygwin build sensitivity to gcc version,
Paul Kienzle <=