[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ISO C++ and Octave
From: |
Mumit Khan |
Subject: |
Re: ISO C++ and Octave |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:48:52 -0600 (CST) |
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, John W. Eaton wrote:
> I'm not sure about the streams stuff yet. I'll have to see what
> happens when I reach that point (still compiling, I guess I need
> faster hardware).
I ran two parallel builds, using egcs-1.1.2 and gcc-2.97-<something>,
before going off to lunch, and looks like *both* finished. I'll do
some quick checks, but looks like we can support both pre- and ISO
compilers with just a few tweaks. I'll send off the patches this
evening.
The saving grace here is JWE's work on not having to depend on the
various extensions provided by libg++ (vform, scan, etc).
Regards,
Mumit
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, (continued)
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Patch [Re: ISO C++ and Octave], Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave,
Mumit Khan <=
Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/30