[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52071] reporting functions that shadow a core
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52071] reporting functions that shadow a core library function is inconsistent. |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:26:05 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:55.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/55.0 |
Update of bug #52071 (project octave):
Priority: 5 - Normal => 3 - Low
Status: None => Confirmed
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #2:
Would we really want to change this behavior?
1. chdir(dir) or cd(dir) → no warning
I could cd to a directory just to look at things, and then cd back out,
without ever having any intention to execute the flip.m m-file. I think it
might be annoying to get lots of false positive warnings about m-files which
are not really problems.
I second Mike's experiments in that the GUI and the CLI both reproduce the
same set of warnings under the same set of circumstances.
I also can reproduce the difference between a compiled function and an m-file.
That seems small, so I lowered the priority, but worth fixing if it would be
easy to do so.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52071>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/