[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Dec 2016 20:15:32 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 |
Follow-up Comment #9, bug #49794 (project octave):
Bringing over comments from Julien at bug #49753
The output from an object which does not define a display method is something,
rather than an error, in Matlab.
>> display (x)
x =
stk_dataframe object: 4-by-2
This matches Amro's observation in comment #6.
This is easy enough to achieve by removing the input validation on isobject.
If I comment out those lines, and use the following blank classdef file
blah.m
classdef blah
endclassdef
then I get the following results
octave:2> x = blah()
x =
<object blah>
octave:3> display (x)
x =
<object blah>
octave:4> y.a = x
y =
scalar structure containing the fields:
a =
<object blah>
octave:5> display (y.a)
<object blah>
Does that look right?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49794>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, Amro, 2016/12/07
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, Rik, 2016/12/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, Guillaume, 2016/12/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, Amro, 2016/12/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, Amro, 2016/12/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, Rik, 2016/12/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, Amro, 2016/12/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, Amro, 2016/12/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, Amro, 2016/12/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions,
Rik <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, Amro, 2016/12/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, John W. Eaton, 2016/12/17
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, Rik, 2016/12/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, Amro, 2016/12/17
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, John W. Eaton, 2016/12/17
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, John W. Eaton, 2016/12/12
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, John W. Eaton, 2016/12/16
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, Rik, 2016/12/16
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, John W. Eaton, 2016/12/16
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49794] display vs. disp functions, Rik, 2016/12/16