[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48572] Visual differences between Octave and
|
From: |
Markus Mützel |
|
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48572] Visual differences between Octave and Matlab |
|
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:44:32 +0000 (UTC) |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:48.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/48.0 |
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #48572 (project octave):
Attaches is a patch that changes isosurface to produce graphics that match
Matlab more closely. It does not include the changes from file #37961.
Matlab seems to place a light by calling "camlight". At least the
automatically placed light is a the exact same positon and of the same type
like the one being places by "camlight". There is patch #9014 that adds this
function to Octave. That should be used in isosurface when the changeset from
patch #9014 has been pushed.
Matlab displays the isosurface without edges to the patches. Since gnuplot
does not implement light, that would look odd. Therefore, I turned "EdgeColor"
black for now.
The output with gnuplot looks wrong when the "FaceColor" of a patch is set to
"flat". If I cannot find an open bug report I will file one on that.
(file #37972)
_______________________________________________________
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: visual_diffs2_isosurface.patch Size:2 KB
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?48572>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/