octave-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48435] Document capabilities and failings of


From: Rik
Subject: [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48435] Document capabilities and failings of each toolkit (gnuplot, fltk, qt)
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:34:06 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0

Update of bug #48435 (project octave):

                Category:    Plotting with OpenGL => Documentation          
                  Status:                   Fixed => Confirmed              
             Open/Closed:                  Closed => Open                   
                 Release:                   4.0.2 => dev                    
                 Summary: transparent patches can only be obtained by printing
to svg with gnuplot => Document capabilities and failings of each toolkit
(gnuplot, fltk, qt)

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #3:

Re-titled and re-opened bug report.

I would like to see a small section at the beginning of the graphics chapter
that discusses the three toolkits and compares and contrasts what is
working/not working in a tabular format.

For example, gnuplot is a very good choice on platforms like Macs that have
trouble with multi-threaded applications.  That is not something that one can
guess at.  And the OpenGL implementation of patches is more complete than
gnuplot, except for transparency where it is less capable.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?48435>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]