|
From: | Rik |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48435] Document capabilities and failings of each toolkit (gnuplot, fltk, qt) |
Date: | Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:34:06 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 |
Update of bug #48435 (project octave): Category: Plotting with OpenGL => Documentation Status: Fixed => Confirmed Open/Closed: Closed => Open Release: 4.0.2 => dev Summary: transparent patches can only be obtained by printing to svg with gnuplot => Document capabilities and failings of each toolkit (gnuplot, fltk, qt) _______________________________________________________ Follow-up Comment #3: Re-titled and re-opened bug report. I would like to see a small section at the beginning of the graphics chapter that discusses the three toolkits and compares and contrasts what is working/not working in a tabular format. For example, gnuplot is a very good choice on platforms like Macs that have trouble with multi-threaded applications. That is not something that one can guess at. And the OpenGL implementation of patches is more complete than gnuplot, except for transparency where it is less capable. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?48435> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |