|
From: | Pantxo Diribarne |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #44670] Implementation of the "openfig" function |
Date: | Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:18:34 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 |
Update of bug #44670 (project octave): Category: GUI => Plotting _______________________________________________________ Follow-up Comment #3: We don't want to duplicate efforts and that's why we implemented a structure similar (same fields) to Matlab one in the hope that struct2hdl would be able to handle both Octave and Matlab figures. Unfortunately I misinterpreted the "special" field and the current version is not compatible with Matlab figures. I think I am the one who proposed the .ofig extension, maybe to avoid bug reports from users trying to open Matlab figs while we know we are not able to render them properly. You are right that the name of the variable in the structure is enough to know where the figure comes from and we should not restrict the extension (as we do with "run" function). Would you agree if I retitle this bug report "hgload can't open Matlab figures" then we see what can be done/merged from your implementation of openfig? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?44670> _______________________________________________ Message posté via/par Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |