|
From: | Rik |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #40470] display routine for variables doesn't detect need for scientific format |
Date: | Thu, 07 Nov 2013 03:15:30 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 |
Update of bug #40470 (project octave): Summary: Wrong output from normcdf (with exp?) for negatives => display routine for variables doesn't detect need for scientific format _______________________________________________________ Follow-up Comment #5: So the problem seems to be a regression in the print routine, rather than a problem with normcdf. I'm re-titling the bug to reflect that. Simple test code to replicate this is: x = [1 2e-6] x = 1.00000 0.00000 Running the same code under 3.6.4 produces: x = [1 2e-6] x = 1.0000e+00 2.0000e-06 _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?40470> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |