octave-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Octave-bug-tracker] Question of JITC


From: John W. Eaton
Subject: Re: [Octave-bug-tracker] Question of JITC
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:53:24 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12

On 08/14/2013 12:45 PM, Max Brister wrote:
Please use the bug tracker to post updates to a bug report.  The mailing list 
is intended as a read-only notification stream.  Info posted to this mailing 
list address won't appear in the tracker database where it is most useful.

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael D. Godfrey
<address@hidden>  wrote:
On 08/11/2013 01:53 PM, Max Brister wrote:

That would be good. I'm not sure what the problem is. Picking which
libraries to link to hasn't changed since llvm 3.1. We just use
llvm-config.

I looked at this a bit more.  It appears that the only method may be:
1. Use llvm-config --libdir  to find the library directory.
2. Test for the needed *.so files in that directory.  Is libLLVM-3.3.so
     all that is needed?
3. Set the right options for the linker.

I have no idea why llvm-config --libnames produces the same output whether
the static libraries are installed of not, and anyhow only reports the
static libraries.

How did this work in 3.1?  Have you found a better way for 3.3?

Michael


It looks like we might have to write the check ourselves for shared vs
static libraries in configure.ac.


Why are messages suddenly being approved without moderation on this list?

Please use the bug tracker to post updates to a bug report.  The
mailing list is intended as a read-only notification stream.  Info
posted to this mailing list address won't appear in the tracker
database where it is most useful.

jwe




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]