[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #34850] Behaviour of chol(a,'lower')

[Salvatore Filippone]

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #34850 (project octave):

Hi, 
I know nothing of Octave internals, but it seems to me that the most logical
way would be to propagate the "lower" choice down to LAPACK; this also saves
the transpose (which takes time). 
I have trouble now looking at the patch something is worng with the
connection, but about a hour ago I got a glimpse, and I remember you are
calling X.transpose() for complex data; in that case you want to have the
conjugate transpose to feed ZPOTRF. 

Salvatore 

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?34850>

_______________________________________________
  Messaggio inviato con/da Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/