[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs
From: |
Michael Richardson |
Subject: |
Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs |
Date: |
Fri, 25 May 2018 13:21:16 -0400 |
Andy Bradford <address@hidden> wrote:
>> So, I don't think this is necessarily a nmh problem, like I said. From
>> a practical standpoint, you're probably one of the few people who
>> actually USES the text/plain content instead of the text/html content.
> Count me as another one of those few people who actually uses the
> text/plain content. :-) For the most part, I don't read emails that are
> HTML only unless I absolutely have to and if there's a text/plain I
> manage with that unless it's terrible.
I also am like this.
And given EFAIL, it seems that we were wise.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] address@hidden http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, (continued)
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, Ken Hornstein, 2018/05/24
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, David Levine, 2018/05/24
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, Ken Hornstein, 2018/05/24
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, David Levine, 2018/05/24
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, Ken Hornstein, 2018/05/24
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, Andy Bradford, 2018/05/25
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/05/25
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs,
Michael Richardson <=
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/05/26
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, Anthony J. Bentley, 2018/05/26
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/05/26
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, David Levine, 2018/05/26
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/05/27
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, David Levine, 2018/05/27
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/05/27
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, David Levine, 2018/05/27
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, Ken Hornstein, 2018/05/27
- Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, Bob Carragher, 2018/05/27