[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Nov 2017 17:32:52 -0500 |
>Users of git nmh have had three years to notice and haven't. I think
>most people that find a folder overflows their column width alter the
>format to add another digit, e.g. as their biggest folder tips over
>10,000. So do folks live with question mark in the output so that
>misalignment will niggle?
Well, I use scan.size, and I noticed right away. So I guess I'm a
user who is complaining about it :-)
>Given that, I don't think it's worth a 1.7.1. We could wait for a user
>to suffer and report it. Or for the next 1.7 problem to be reported as
>that may warrant a fix release and this could jump aboard.
I'm willing to wait to see if any other problems surface that would
warrant a 1.7.1.
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, David Levine, 2017/11/21
Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/22