Re: [Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions.

[Kevin Cosgrove]

On 28 October 2017 at 1:10, Ralph Corderoy <address@hidden> wrote:

> I'm tinkering with SPECS/nmh.spec and SPECS/nmh.cygport, in particular
> removing the statement a GUI is required if nmh is to be used as one's
> main MUA.  :-)
> 
[snip]
>
> So of the four {Cygwin,Fedora}/{xmh,exmh}, is it only Cygwin/xmh that's
> a package?  I'm thinking of referring to that package, but ensure both
> programs are mentioned in both.

I've packaged exmh for fedora and would be happy to share my spec 
file.



--
Kevin