nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again


From: Ken Hornstein
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:42:08 -0400

>So some of us are seeing 10+ second scans locally.
>
>I really need to upgrade to a 500G SSD. :)  (which I guess answers the
>"is it reasonable/tolerable" question :)

I feel it's only fair to point out that 10 seconds was across the
Atlantic Ocean.  To the same server a few states away, that same scan
took me half a second.

Okay, to be fair, it would be more accurate to say that retrieving all
of the data needed to do that scan too a half a second.  There is still all
of the processing nmh needed to do.  It would be intersting to see how
much overhead that adds.

--Ken



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]