[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3 |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 19:35:38 -0400 |
>tar -zxvf nmh-1.7-RC3.tar.gz
>cd nmh-1.7-RC3
>./configure
>make
>make check
>
>after resolving the send: -port 25 -notls issue in my .mh_profile I am
>here to report the following:
Silly question time ... why is everyone adding -notls? That's the
default (and that hasn't changed). If our documentation isn't clear,
fine, but I am just trying to understand how we got here.
>Binary files /home/jerry/code/nmh-1.7-RC3/test/testdir/21786.draft and
>/home/jerry/code/nmh-1.7-RC3/test/testdir/21786.expected differ
That's ... interesting.
>./test/mhbuild/test-attach: test failed, outputs are in
>/home/jerry/code/nmh-1.7-RC3/test/testdir/21786.draft and
>/home/jerry/code/nmh-1.7-RC3/test/testdir/21786.expected.
>FAIL: test/mhbuild/test-attach
I think that might have been cleaned up. Could you do:
make check TESTS=test/mhbuild/test-attach
And then let us know what the files that it claimed were different actually
contained?
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3, (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3, heymanj, 2017/08/25
Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3, heymanj, 2017/08/25
Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3, Ken Hornstein, 2017/08/25
Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3, heymanj, 2017/08/26
Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/26
Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3, heymanj, 2017/08/26
Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/26