[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh Speed Measured by ltrace(1).

From: Howard Bampton
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh Speed Measured by ltrace(1).
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 12:40:02 -0400

Silly question. I don't see any mention of buffer cache effects being
worked around. Are you running a scan, tossing the results, then
rerunning the scan?

I know with rsync on large directory trees (even when nothing needs
changed), the second and later passes are substantially quicker and I
would expect a similar, albeit less pronounced (~5K files vs. ~1M in
my experiences), outcome here.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]